Ron Hayduk
Ron Hayduk
Navigation
  • Home
  • About me
  • Political projects
  • Publications
  • Immigrant voting

Colorado History

cohistory

The Immigrant Voting Project and
New York University Law Students for Human Rights

Resident Noncitizen Voting in Colorado:
A History

Colorado, admitted to statehood in 1876, included declarant alien voting in its first Constitution, providing suffrage to every non-citizen who “declared his intention, according to law, to become [a U.S. citizen].”[1]  A constitutional amendment of 1902, however, ended non-citizen voting.[2] As currently amended, Colorado’s constitution provides suffrage to “every citizen of the United States” who meets age, residency, and other requirements.[3] (This and similar wording, however, has been interpreted in other states to guarantee voting rights to U.S. citizens but not necessarily to exclude others.) Colorado elections law lists U.S. citizenship among its registration requirements.[4]

Connecting women’s and non-citizens’ voting rights, Coloradans resisted women’s suffrage in 1876, at the same time as the state opened voting to male non-citizens, and then liberalized voting rights with regard to women in 1893, shortly before it closed voting to non-citizens.  At the Convention on the adoption of Colorado’s Constitution of 1876, female suffrage, not alien suffrage, was the most controversial voting provision debated.  The Constitution ultimately adopted did not give women the right to vote, although suffragists succeeded in pushing through a provision enabling Colorado to adopt women’s suffrage in the future by a simple majority vote of the legislature and electorate, rather than a constitutional amendment.[5]  One delegate to the Convention, in a minority report supporting female suffrage, cited many arguments that modern advocates advance in support of non-citizen voting rights, declaring that:  

“It may be stated as a rule applicable to every species of republic, that depriving any class of the right of Suffrage, invites contempt of that class, and in fact produces it. Further, in a republic the right of Suffrage is part of the means of wellfare of any person, or class of persons….

 

In the city of New York alone, more than forty thousand women are making vests and shirts at ten cents apiece, toiling with bleeding fingers and weary eyes at late hours, to find a scanty support for their children.

 

In all the Union there are doubtless near a million of such cases. They represent perhaps three millions of children. There are today thousands in Colorado. In the near future there will be ten thousand. Can any one suppose that if these women had the right to vote their interests would not be looked after by the politicians of all classes?”[6]

 

While Colorado voters ultimately accepted the arguments for extending suffrage to women, however, the Colorado Supreme Court has explicitly rejected similar arguments that equal protection principles demand that non-citizen parents be granted the right to vote in school district elections.  In the 1976 decision Skafte v. Rorex, the state’s highest court held that “the state’s citizenship requirements for a school district election do not contravene the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The state has a rational interest in limiting participation in government to those persons within the political community. Aliens are not a part of the political community.”[7]

 


REFERENCES

[1] CO Const. of 1876, Art. VII, Sec. 1.  Reproduced in Francis Newton Thorpe, The Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters, and Other Organic Laws of the States, Territories, and Colonies Now or Hertofore Forming the United States of America 492 (1909).

[2] Raskin at 1416.

[3] CO Const. Art. 7, § 1.

[4] C.R.S.A. § 1-2-101.

[5] Colorado voters and legislators voted to enfranchise women in 1893.  Women and Social Movements website, Why Did Colorado Suffragists Succeed in Winning the Right to Vote in 1893 and Not in 1877?,  Available at http://womhist.binghamton.edu/colosuff/intro.htm.

[6] “Judge Bromwell’s Minority Report on Suffrage: Read, Ordered Printed, and Laid on the Table for Future Consideration,” 8 February 1876, pp. 1-9, Records of the Colorado Constitutional Convention (1875-1879), -M1599, Western History Collection, The Denver Public Library, Denver, Colorado.  Available at http://womhist.binghamton.edu/colosuff/doc1.htm .

[7] Skafte v. Rorex, 191 Colo. 399, 402 (Colo. 1976).

Immigrant Voting

  • Home
  • About Immigrant Voting »
    • How To Use This » »
      • Coalition to Expand Voting Rights (NYC)
  • CURRENT IMMIGRANT VOTING PRACTICES AND MOVEMENTS IN THE U.S »
    • State Histories » »
      • California History
      • Colorado History
      • Connecticut History
      • Florida History
      • Illinois History
      • Maine History
      • Maryland History
      • Massachusetts History
      • Minnesota History
      • New Jersey History
      • New York History
      • North Carolina History
      • Oregon History
      • Texas History
      • Vermont History
      • Virginia History
      • Washington History
      • Wisconsin History
  • Around The World »
    • Country Summaries » »
      • Belgium
      • Hong Kong
      • Switzerland
      • Venezuela
  • California
  • Connecticut
  • Illinois
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusets
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Texas
  • Vermont
  • Wisconsin
  • California Legislation
  • Maine Legislation
  • Massachusetts Legislation
  • New York Legislation
  • Washington Legislation

© 2021 Ron Hayduk